Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 16:41
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
Rare Red Sprite Photographed in Tibet Dazzles Social Media - PetaPixel
Russia can stop this any time.
What’s next?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Need a different reason to eat more fiber? How about microplastics? - The Seattle Times
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Thank you.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Roster rankings: PFF gives an ugly grade to the Browns roster - Dawgs By Nature
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.